
Nimrod deiefied as B’aal



Greek
Latin
Hebrew
Arabic
Hathor (Ancient Egyptian: ḥwt-ḥr, lit. ‘House of Horus’, Ancient Greek: Ἁθώρ Hathōr, Coptic: ϩⲁⲑⲱⲣ) was a major goddess in ancient Egyptian religion who played a wide variety of roles. As a sky deity, she was the mother or consort of the sky god Horus and the sun god Ra, both of whom were connected with kingship, and thus she was the symbolic mother of their earthly representatives, the pharaohs.
Hathor was often depicted as a cow, symbolizing her maternal and celestial aspect, although her most common form was a woman wearing a headdress of cow horns and a sun disk. She could also be represented as a lioness, cobra, or sycamore tree.
“one of the native people of Arabia and surrounding regions,”
indigenous name of the people, perhaps literally “inhabitant of the desert” and related to Hebrew arabha “desert.”
Meaning “homeless little wanderer, child of the street” is from 1848 (Arab of the city, but the usual form was city arab), in reference to the nomadic ways of the Bedouin.
From Latin, “against a thing.” Concerning the status of a particular piece of property.
For instance, in-rem jurisdiction refers to the power of a court over an item of real or personal property. The “thing” over which the court has power may be a piece of land or even a marriage. Thus, a court with only in-rem jurisdiction may terminate a marriage or declare who owns a piece of land. In-rem jurisdiction is based on the location of the property and enforcement follows property rather than person.
Litigans who are capable of defending themselves, may do so with Federal Law and Supreme Court cases which are allowed in state courts.
This ends the change of the “unauthorized practice of law.” No one is above the law or has exclusive rights to exercise Black’s Law Dictionary 3rd Pocket Addition the law
Barratry
*All of the courts are tied directly to banks to monetize the bonds placed on uneducated people that are unwittingly forced into contracts. Forced contracts are unlawful under Article I Section 10 of the Constitution as well as under UCC 3-3035
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the right to enforce the obligation of a party to pay an instrument is subject to the following:
(1) a defense of the obligor based on (i) infancy of the obligor to the extent it is a defense to a simple contract, (ii) duress, lack of legal capacity, or illegality of the transaction which, under other law, nullifies the obligation of the obligor, (iii) fraud that induced the obligor to sign the instrument with neither knowledge nor reasonable opportunity to learn of its character or its essential terms, or (iv) discharge of the obligor in insolvency proceedings;
(2) a defense of the obligor stated in another section of this Article or a defense of the obligor that would be available if the person entitled to enforce the instrument were enforcing a right to payment under a simple contract; and
(3) a claim in recoupment of the obligor against the original payee of the instrument if the claim arose from the transaction that gave rise to the instrument; but the claim of the obligor may be asserted against a transferee of the instrument only to reduce the amount owing on the instrument at the time the action is brought.