
Before Marriage


4 Classifications:
National (enforce all political rights)
Citizen (civil rights)
Subject (servant) (civil rights)
Alien (black)


https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/decolonization
Requirements
Package Name: Circle 7 of Fact
Terra nullius is a Latin expression meaning “nobody’s land” and is used in international law to justify claims that territory may be acquired by a state’s occupation. There are currently three territories claimed to be terra nullius, two of which are caused by border disputes between sovereign states

c. 1400, “mission of a deputy or envoy,” from Old French legation “embassy, mission” and directly from Latin legationem (nominative legatio) “the office of an ambassador,” noun of action from past participle stem of legare “send as a deputy” (see legate). From c. 1600 as “body of deputies sent, representatives,” 1832 as “official residence of a diplomat.”
“ties or obligations of a citizen or subject to a government or sovereign,” late 14c., alligeaunce, formed in English from Anglo-French legaunce “loyalty of a liege-man to his lord,” from Old French legeance, from liege (see liege (adj.)). Corrupted in spelling by confusion with the now-obsolete legal term allegeance “alleviation, mitigation” (for which see allay (v.)). The general figurative sense of “recognition of claims to respect or duty, observance of obligation” is attested from 1732. French allégeance in this sense is said to be from English.

Triple Principles:
Sovereignty and Independnce
Integrity of domain and
Economic liberty without any inequality
Soverignty supreme authority within a territory
Independence – Freedom from external control or influence (U.S. Corporate, chartered colony franchise, local muniicpality)
Moorish State who has returned unto the entire submission fo Moroccan law and should have the abiliy to govern itself through laws and enforcement of its own creation
The Sheriffian States Jurisdiction should be expressed through three branches of governance(legistlative, executive and judicial)
Uti Possidetis jurisdiction by enforcing its own internal law as well as treaty and accession documents tha thold all international parties accountable
Moorish jurisdiction must have contro lover its own jurisdiction and borders and borders should b erespcted by other States be they U.S. Corporate franchesees or moorish
Triple Principle is important for maintaining security and stability as well as protecting the inalienable/unalienable rights of its Nationals.
Economic Liberty without any inequality:
This principle refers to the idea that a State should have the freedom to pursue its own economic policies and development of LAW (Land, Air, Water & Mineral Resources)
The Sherrifian authority must ensure that trade and commerce is fair and equitable for its protected Nationals.
This means all obstacles and encumbrances must be removed to ensure that State nationals are able to carve out a fair share of all available markets.
This principle is important for stimulating growth and maintain social stability within the culture of the autochtonous indigenous Moors
Commerce in the form of thriving businesses, banks and institutions will ensure a stable future for all States.
These tenets are considered essential to maintaining self-determination, security and prosperity.
They are also closely linked to the principles of non-interference, self-defense and self-sufficiency.
Laws must meet at the nexus of these concepts, self-determination, obligation, treaty, and accession.
The legislative branch is an integral part of government because it is responsible crafting laws.
Laws are the foundation of the society’s legal system and provide the framework for the societal functions and freedoms.
Our laws, those enacted within the a Sherrifian State must delineate and differentiate our society from that of the colonizing power.
The must provide contraints or accountability for those that seek to do harm to Moors and reinforce the cultural strength amongst our caucus.
The Matriarchs of the legislative branch are elected by the nationals and are accountable to States constituents.
This gives the people a voice in government and allows them to shape the laws that govern their individual lives.
It is important for the Moorish States to have laws specific to their own jurisdiction for several reasons:
Sovereignty: A state’s ability to govern itself independently is a fundamental aspect of its sovereignty.
Having laws specific to our own jurisdiction allows the consular court to rule based on the voice of the people and punish those in violation of civil and criminal infractions.
It gives license for a state to exercise its powers and make decisions based on its own needs and circumstances.
Legal certainty: Laws specific to a state’s jurisdiction provide legal certainty for the Moorish state’s nationals and businesses.
The know what is expected of them and can plan accordingly.
The consular court can begin to establish its own [stare decisis] by which to rule
Adaptability: Laws specific to state’s jurisdiction can be more easily adapted to the state’s changing needs, without having to renegotiate international treaties or agreements
Compliance with Internal Law: In some cases, the state laws should be consistent with the international laws and conventions, to which the State is a party.
These laws can be used to ensure compliance with international obligations and prevent conflicts between national and international laws.
Protection of rights and interests: Specific laws are necessary to protect the rights and interests of the State’s Nationals, such as laws related to travel, and civil and criminal justice.
Laws also empower the Consular Court and enable them to seek justice and recompense for crimes against the State or its Nationals.
Lastly, the legislative branch is responsible for ratifying treaties, should any be proposed between the Moorish States.
This gives them a critical role in shaping the future relations between Moorish States and future trade partners.
Montevideo Convention,
International agreement [1933]
Montevideo Convention, in full Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, agreement signed at Montevideo, Uruguay, on December 26, 1933 (and entering into force the following year), that established the standard definition of a state under international law. Adopted by the Seventh International Conference of American States, the convention stipulated that all states were equal sovereign units consisting of a permanent population, defined territorial boundaries, a government, and an ability to enter into agreements with other states. Among the convention’s provisions were that signatories would not intervene in the domestic or foreign affairs of another state, that they would not recognize territorial gains made by force, and that all disputes should be settled peacefully. The agreement was signed by the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Bolivia was the only country attending the conference that refused to sign the agreement.