Author: iamking

Research

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?t=6981
http://freedom-school.com/keating/index.htm
http://freedom-school.com/keating/jean-keating-study-guide.html
https://www.freedom-school.com/aware/cestui-qui-trust-the-strawman.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cestui_quea
https://understandcontractlawandyouwin.com/jean-keating/

Supporting Documents

House Joint resolution 194
S Con Res 26
13th amendment w. 20 sections April 9. 1864
UNDRIP
Congressional Record p. A3220
Congress No longer bound by the constitution but must promote Human Rights)
Article 6 Clause 1 & 2 Constitution of USA
Unilofe Article 19 – UN international law of the sea
UNITREAL UN Convention Trade Law
1666 Cestui Qui Trust
1640 Cestui Qui Trust Act
1707 Cestui Qui Trust t Act
1666 Queen Victoria and Chief of Canada
Regina v. Ja
Export Declaration U.S. Canada & Mexico
Lean on: Rothschild, Pentagon & White House
Protocols of __ Elders of Zion
Mitsnah
Interview of Rabbi Finkelstein
1917 Trading w. t he Enemy of
Lieber Code (General Orders 100-103)
Law 89-719 US Declared Bankrupt and Insolvent
United Nations Charter Article 55 & 56
UN Declaration on Human Rights

discharge (n.)

late 14c., “relief from misfortune,” see discharge (v.). Meaning “release from work or duty” is from early 15c. Meaning “act of sending out or pouring forth” is from c. 1600; sense of “that which is emitted or poured forth” is from 1727. Meaning “action of firing off a firearm or other missile weapon” is from 1590s. Electricity sense is from 1794. 

discharge (v.)

early 14c., “to exempt, exonerate, release, free (from an obligation),” from Old French deschargier “to unload, discharge” (12c., Modern French décharger), from Late Latin discarricare, from dis- “do the opposite of” (see dis-) + carricare “to load a wagon or cart,” from Latin carrus “two-wheeled wagon” (see car).

Meaning “to fulfill, to perform (one’s duties, etc.)” is from c. 1400.  Sense of “dismiss from office or employment” is from c. 1400. Meaning “to unload, to free from, disburden” is late 14c. Of weapons, “send forth by propulsion,” transitive, 1550s; “to fire off,” intransitive, 1580s. Of a river, “to empty itself,” c. 1600. The electrical sense is first attested 1748. Related: Discharged; discharging.

determination (n.)

mid-14c., determinacioun, “decision, sentence in a suit at law, definite or authoritative judicial settlement,” from Old French déterminacion “determination, settlement, definition” (14c.) and directly from Medieval Latin determinationem (nominative determinatio) “conclusion, boundary,” noun of action from past-participle stem of Latin determinare “to enclose, bound, set limits to” (see determine).

Meaning “action of definitely ascertaining” is from 1670s; that of “result ascertained, a conclusion” is from 1560s. As “fixed direction toward a goal or terminal point,” from 1650s, originally in physics or anatomy; metaphoric sense “fixation of will toward a goal, state of mental resolution with regard to something” is from 1680s; general sense of “quality of being resolute, fixedness of purpose as a character trait” is by 1822.

Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917

The Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) of 1917 (40 Stat. 411, codified at 12 U.S.C. § 95 and 50 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq.) is a United States federal law, enacted on October 6, 1917, that gives the President the power to oversee or restrict any and all trade between the United States and its enemies in times of war but was expanded to be usable in times of peace via congressional amendment. It was amended again alongside the passage of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to be applicable only in times of war, while the IEEPA was intended to be used in times of peace.[1][2]

TWEA is sometimes confused with the IEEPA, which grants somewhat broader powers to the President, and which is invoked during states of emergency when the United States is not at war. The IEEPA was passed in an attempt to rein in perceived abuses by the US President of the TWEA by making the powers subject to the National Emergencies Act (NEA). The NEA included a legislative veto to allow Congress to terminate a national emergency with a concurrent resolution.[3] However, the U.S. Supreme Court found such legislative vetoes unconstitutional in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha. Following the Court’s decision, Congress amended the NEA to require a joint resolution.[4]

As of 2018, Cuba is the only country restricted under the Act. North Korea was removed from the provisions of the Act in 2008, although restrictions under IEEPA authority remain in effect.[5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trading_with_the_Enemy_Act_of_1917